Factors associated with the development of exudation in treatment-naive eyes with nonexudative macular neovascularization.

PURPOSE: To identify the predictive factors for development of exudation in patients with treatment-naïve nonexudative macular neovascularization (MNV). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 61 treatment-naïve patients with nonexudative MNV who had not received treatment for nonexudative MNV before the exudation developed. Baseline characteristics and changes in MNV were evaluated using multivariate modeling to determine the potential risk factors for exudative conversion. RESULTS: Exudation development was identified in 31.1% (19/61 eyes) of the study eyes during the 46.2 ± 8.2-month mean follow-up period. The mean period of development of exudation from the baseline was 21.5 ± 6.7 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that older age (hazard ratio [HR] of 1.380, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.129-1.688, P = 0.008), larger MNV area at baseline (HR of 1.715, CI 1.288-2.308; P = 0.006), increase of MNV area by doubling (HR of 4.992, CI 1.932-9.246; P = 0.002), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) elevation more than 100 µm (HR of 1.017, CI 1.006-1.233; P = 0.015) were associated with increased risk of the development of exudation. CONCLUSION: Older age, larger MNV area, increasing MNV area, and higher RPE elevation were associated with an increased risk of exudative conversion in patients with treatment-naïve nonexudative MNV. Identifying these risk factors may be helpful in establishing treatment strategies and monitoring patients.

CHARACTERISTICS PREDICTIVE OF FELLOW-EYE GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY WITHOUT NEOVASCULARIZATION IN UNILATERAL TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive characteristics of fellow-eye geographic atrophy (GA) without neovascularization in patients with unilateral Type 3 macular neovascularization. METHODS: This retrospective study included 84 patients who were diagnosed with unilateral Type 3 macular neovascularization. Patients who developed fellow-eye neovascularization and those exhibiting GA without neovascularization at the final follow-up were included in the neovascularization and GA groups, respectively. The patient demographics and baseline fellow-eye characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 40.5 ± 11.5 months after diagnosis. Patients included in the GA group (n = 28) were significantly older (mean 77.4 ± 5.2 years vs. 74.2 ± 5.8 years, P = 0.016), had significantly thinner subfoveal choroidal thickness (mean 109.4 ± 36.8 µ m vs. 173.1 ± 77.6 µ m, P < 0.001), and had a significantly higher incidence of baseline GA (39.3% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.019) than those included in the neovascularization group (n = 56). In the multivariate analysis, subfoveal choroidal thickness showed a close negative association with the risk of GA rather than neovascularization ( P = 0.004, ß = 0.982, 95% confidence interval = 0.970-0.994). CONCLUSION: In patients with unilateral Type 3 macular neovascularization, older age, the presence of GA, and a thin choroid in the fellow eye were found to be indicative of a higher probability of progression toward fellow-eye GA instead of neovascularization may be potential candidates for future complement inhibitor treatments targeting fellow-eye GA.

Intravitreal Brolucizumab and Aflibercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injections of brolucizumab and aflibercept in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: In total, 62 treatment-naive PCV eyes (62 patients) treated with intravitreal brolucizumab or aflibercept were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received a monthly loading injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor for 3 months, followed by further injections as required. Visual and anatomical outcomes were compared between drugs after 12 months of treatment. Results: The improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after 12 months of treatment was not significantly different between the brolucizumab-treated (22 eyes) and aflibercept-treated groups (40 eyes). However, in the brolucizumab-treated group, there was a significantly greater decrease in central retinal thickness (172 vs. 147 µm; P = 0.031) and subfoveal choroidal thickness after treatment (51 vs. 29 µm; P = 0.025). In addition, the regression rate of polypoidal lesions was significantly higher in the brolucizumab-treated group (77.3%, 17/22 eyes) than that in the aflibercept-treated group (45.0%, 18/40 eyes; P = 0.014). Sterile intraocular inflammation showing mild vitritis was observed in 1 of the 22 eyes (4.5%) of brolucizumab-treated patients. Conclusion: Intravitreal brolucizumab injections for PCV showed visual improvement comparable to that of aflibercept during the 12-month treatment period. However, brolucizumab was more effective than aflibercept for the regression of polypoidal lesions and caused a greater decrease in central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness.

Incidence of early complications requiring treatment plan changes after vitreoretinal surgery: a single-center study in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding incidence of treatment plan changes may be useful when discussing postoperative treatment plans for patients. Moreover, it may help establish a standardized postoperative treatment plan. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of early complications requiring treatment plan changes in patients following vitreoretinal surgery and investigate its risk factors. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 465 patients who had undergone vitreoretinal surgery. The reasons, incidence, and timing of treatment plan changes within 14 days of surgery were identified. Potential factors associated with the changes, such as patient demographics, surgeon's experience, diagnoses, and type of surgery were also analyzed. RESULTS: The treatment plan was changed in 76 patients (16.3%) at a mean of 4.0 ± 3.2 days after vitreoretinal surgery. The reasons for the plan changes were increased intraocular pressure (IIOP) in 66(86.8%), intraocular inflammation in 2(2.6%), corneal edema in 3(3.9%), leakage from the sclerotomy wound in 3(3.9%) patients, and combined IIOP and intraocular inflammation in 2(2.6%). The date of discharge was postponed because of treatment plan changes in 17 patients (22.4%). The incidence of plan changes was higher in patients who underwent gas or oil tamponade (P < 0.001) and those who underwent surgery performed by less experienced surgeons (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment plan was changed in 16.3% of patients after vitreoretinal surgery. The risk of treatment plan changes was associated with the surgeon's experience in vitreoretinal surgery and the type of surgery. These results should be considered when establishing standardized care plans for patients who require vitreoretinal surgery.

Influence of lesion location on lesion reactivation after initial treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: We aim to evaluate the factors associated with the incidence of lesion reactivation after initial loading injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD who received three loading injections of either ranibizumab or aflibercept. After the initial treatment, patients were followed up every 1-2 months during the first year and the follow-up interval was extended to 4 months during the second year. Retreatment was administered on an as-needed basis. The incidence and timing of lesion reactivation at 24 months after diagnosis were identified. In addition, Cox's proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the association of baseline factors with lesion reactivation. Lesion reactivation was defined re-accumulation of subretinal fluid/intraretinal fluid or the development of subretinal/intraretinal hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 284 patients (173 men and 111 women) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 70.5 ± 8.8 years. During the 24-month follow-up period, lesion reactivation was observed in 216 eyes (76.1%) at a mean of 8.2 ± 4.4 months after diagnosis. The incidence of lesion reactivation was 62.5% in extrafoveal macular neovascularization (MNV), 75.0% in juxtafoveal MNV, and 79.5% in subfoveal MNV. The extrafoveal MNV showed significantly lower incidence of lesion reactivation than subfoveal MNV (P = 0.041, hazard ratio = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Extrafoveal MNVs showed a lower incidence of lesion reactivation after initial treatment than subfoveal MNVs. This result should be considered when interpreting the results of clinical trials with different eligibility criteria regarding lesion location.

Prediction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent-specific treatment outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a generative adversarial network.

To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model that predicts anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent-specific anatomical treatment outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), thereby assisting clinicians in selecting the most suitable anti-VEGF agent for each patient. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD who received three loading injections of either ranibizumab or aflibercept. Training was performed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images with an attention generative adversarial network (GAN) model. To test the performance of the AI model, the sensitivity and specificity to predict the presence of retinal fluid after treatment were calculated for the AI model, an experienced (Examiner 1), and a less experienced (Examiner 2) human examiners. A total of 1684 OCT images from 842 patients (419 treated with ranibizumab and 423 treated with aflibercept) were used as the training set. Testing was performed using images from 98 patients. In patients treated with ranibizumab, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 0.615 and 0.667 for the AI model, 0.385 and 0.861 for Examiner 1, and 0.231 and 0.806 for Examiner 2. In patients treated with aflibercept, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 0.857 and 0.881 for the AI model, 0.429 and 0.976 for Examiner 1, and 0.429 and 0.857 for Examiner 2. In 18.5% of cases, the fluid status of synthetic posttreatment images differed between ranibizumab and aflibercept. The AI model using GAN might predict anti-VEGF agent-specific short-term treatment outcomes with relatively higher sensitivity than human examiners. Additionally, there was a difference in the efficacy in fluid resolution between the anti-VEGF agents. These results suggest the potential of AI in personalized medicine for patients with neovascular AMD.

SUBRETINAL FLUID ASSOCIATED WITH DRUSENOID PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical characteristics of drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment (PED) with subretinal fluid (SRF) and to evaluate the impact of SRF on the long-term visual and anatomical outcomes. METHODS: Forty-seven eyes with drusenoid PED (47 patients) who completed >24 months of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Intergroup comparisons of the visual and anatomical outcomes with and without SRF were made. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 32.9 ± 18.7 months. The group with drusenoid PED with SRF (14 eyes) showed significantly higher PED height (468 ± 130 µ m vs. 313 ± 88 µ m, P < 0.001), larger PED diameter (2,328 ± 953 µ m vs. 1,227 ± 882 µ m, P < 0.001), and larger PED volume (1.88 ± 1.73 mm 3 vs. 1.12 ± 1.35 mm 3 , P = 0.021) than that in the group with drusenoid PED without SRF (33 eyes) at baseline. No significant intergroup difference was found regarding the best-corrected visual acuity at the final visit. In addition, the incidence of complete retinal pigment epithelial and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA; 21.4%) and the development of macular neovascularization (MNV; 7.1%) for the group with drusenoid PED with SRF showed no difference compared with those (39.4% for cRORA development and 9.1% for MNV development) with drusenoid PED without SRF. CONCLUSION: The size, height, and volume of drusenoid PED were associated with the development of SRF. The SRF in drusenoid PED did not affect the visual prognosis or the development of macular atrophy during long-term follow-up.

INCIDENCE AND TIMING OF PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT AND SUBRETINAL FLUID DEVELOPMENT IN TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and timing of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and subretinal fluid (SRF) development in type 3 macular neovascularization. METHODS: This retrospective study included 84 patients who were diagnosed with treatment-naïve type 3 macular neovascularization who did not show SRF at diagnosis. All patients were initially treated with three loading injections of ranibizumab or aflibercept. After the initial loading injections, as-needed regimen was performed for retreatment. The development of either PED or SRF was identified. The incidence and timing of PED development in patients without PED at diagnosis and that of SRF development in patients with PED at diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 41.3 ± 20.7 months after diagnosis. Among the 32 patients without serous PED at diagnosis, PED developed in 20 (62.5%) at a mean of 10.9 ± 5.1 months after diagnosis. PED development was noted within 12 months in 15 patients (46.8%; 75.0% among the PED development cases). In 52 patients with serous PED and without SRF at diagnosis, 15 developed SRF (28.8%) at a mean of 11.2 ± 6.4 months after diagnosis. SRF development was noted within 12 months in nine patients (17.3%; 66.6% among the SRF development cases). CONCLUSION: PED and SRF developed in a substantial proportion of patients with type 3 macular neovascularization. The average period of development of these pathologic findings was within 12 months of diagnosis, suggesting the need for active treatment during the early treatment period to improve treatment outcomes.

Difference in characteristics and lesion reactivation between type 3 macular neovascularization with and without subretinal fluid at baseline.

PURPOSE: To compare the characteristics and incidence rates of lesion reactivation after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) with and without subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline. METHODS: This retrospective study included 95 patients diagnosed with type 3 MNV. After the initial loading injections, re-treatment was performed when lesion reactivation occurred defined as the re-accumulation of subretinal or intraretinal fluid or the new development of a retinal/subretinal hemorrhage. The differences in the baseline characteristics and the incidence rates of lesion reactivation were compared between patients with SRF (SRF group, n = 42) and those without SRF (non-SRF group, n = 53). RESULTS: At diagnosis, the mean visual acuity was worse (0.68 ± 0.41 vs 0.50 ± 0.36; P = 0.032), mean central retinal thickness was greater (515.4 ± 145.9 µm vs 383.8 ± 105.5 µm; P < 0.001), and the incidence of focal retinal hemorrhages was higher (90.5% vs 66.0%; P = 0.005) in the SRF group than in the non-SRF group. In the SRF group, the first lesion reactivation was noted in 89.7% at a mean of 5.8 ± 4.4 months after the third injection. In the non-SRF group, the first lesion reactivation was noted in 70.6% at a mean of 6.1 ± 3.8 months. There was a significant difference in lesion reactivation between the two groups (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in the baseline characteristics and incidence of lesion reactivation between type 3 MNV with and without SRF suggests that the presence of SRF may be indicative of more advanced disease with a high risk of visual deterioration. This result also suggests the need for more active treatment to preserve vision in patients with SRF.

Difference in Lesion Reactivation between Pure Type 2 and Mixed Type 1 and 2 Macular Neovascularization and its Influence on Long-Term Treatment Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare lesion reactivation and treatment outcomes between pure type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). METHODS: This retrospective study included 155 patients diagnosed with type 2 MNV. After the initial loading injections, as-needed retreatment was provided. The difference in first lesion reactivation after the initial treatment was evaluated between pure type 2 MNV (pure type 2 group, n = 37) and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV (mixed group, n = 118). The degree of change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 32.7 ± 13.7 months. Lesion reactivation differed significantly between the type 2 (60.0%) and mixed (84.5%) (P = .004) groups. The degree of visual change during the follow-up period also differed significantly between the pure type 2 (mean 2.8 lines of improvement) and mixed (mean 0.2 lines of deterioration) (P = .008) groups. In multivariate analysis, lesion type (P = .012) and baseline visual acuity (P = .002) were significantly associated with ≥2 lines of visual improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion reactivation and treatment outcomes differed between pure type 2 and mixed type 1 and 2 MNV. These results suggested the need for different treatment strategies for these two MNV subtypes.

Comparison of 24-month treatment outcomes between as-needed treatment and switching to treat-and-extend in type 3 macular neovascularization.

This study aimed to compare 24-month treatment outcomes between patients with type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) treated using an as-needed regimen and those who switched to treat-and-extend (TAE). This retrospective study included 32 patients who were initially treated with an as-needed regimen but switched to TAE (TAE group) and 74 patients who were treated with an as-needed regimen throughout the follow-up period (as-needed group). The number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and degree of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 24 months were compared between the two groups. The incidence of fibrotic scarring, tears of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and subretinal hemorrhage was also evaluated. The number of anti-VEGF injections was higher in the TAE group (mean: 11.7) than in the as-needed group (mean: 6.9; P < 0.001). The BCVA outcome (measured using the mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) was significantly better in the TAE group (mean improvement of logMAR 0.15) than in the as-needed group (mean deterioration of logMAR 0.15). The incidence of fibrotic scarring (6.3% vs. 18.9%), RPE tears (3.1% vs. 6.8%), and subretinal hemorrhage (0% vs. 9.5%) was relatively lower in the TAE group. Treatment outcomes of the TAE group were better than those of the as-needed group, suggesting that switching to the TAE regimen would be a useful approach for patients with type 3 MNV requiring efficient treatment.

Comparison of treatment methods for submacular hemorrhage in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: conservative versus active surgical strategy.

The optimal treatment of submacular hemorrhage (SMH) following neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is controversial. This study aimed to compare visual outcomes of conservative versus active surgical treatment. Two hundred thirty-six eyes of 236 patients with SMH (≥ 1 disc diameter) were stratified into four groups: observation (n = 21); anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy (n = 161); non-surgical gas tamponade (n = 31); and subretinal surgery (n = 23). The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months. The baseline BCVAs of the observation, anti-VEGF monotherapy, non-surgical gas tamponade, and subretinal surgery groups were 1.50 ± 0.70, 1.09 ± 0.70, 1.31 ± 0.83, and 1.62 ± 0.77 logarithm of minimal angle resolution (LogMAR), respectively. The mean BCVAs at 12 months were 1.39 ± 0.84, 0.90 ± 0.83, 1.35 ± 0.88, and 1.44 ± 0.91 LogMAR, respectively. After adjusting for age, baseline BCVA, SMH size, and the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections before SMH, the mean BCVA showed no significant difference among treatments at 12 months (P = 0.204). The anti-VEGF monotherapy group showed better mean BCVA significantly at 3 months (P < 0.001). Only baseline BCVA was associated with VA gain at 12 months (Odds ratio = 3.53, P < 0.001). This study demonstrated that there was no difference in 12 month visual outcomes among treatments and a better early visual outcome can be expected with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Development of subretinal hemorrhage after treatment discontinuation for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and their influence on visual outcomes of subretinal hemorrhage (SRH) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV) who discontinue treatment. METHODS: This retrospective study included 148 patients with nAMD and PCV who discontinued treatment. The development of a 3-disc area or greater extent of SRH after treatment discontinuation was identified. Visual acuity at the final visit was compared between patients with and those without SRH. Factors associated with SRH were then analyzed. RESULTS: During the mean 56.8 ± 18.2 months of follow-up, treatment was discontinued at a mean 24.1 ± 16.3 months after diagnosis. SRH developed in 24 (16.2%) patients at a mean 21.5 ± 17.6 months after treatment discontinuation. The visual acuity at the final follow-up was significantly worse in patients with SRH than in those without SRH (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the incidence of SRH among the different types of macular neovascularization (MNV) (P = 0.024). In particular, the incidence of type 3 MNV was relatively high (36.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The development of SRH may lead to very poor visual prognosis in patients who discontinue treatment. The high risk of SRH in type 3 MNV suggests the need for caution when choosing treatment discontinuation in cases of type 3 MNV.

Difference Between the Incidence of Retinal Fluid Subtypes and Their Association with Visual Outcomes According to the Types of Macular Neovascularization in a Korean Population.

Purpose: To investigate differences in the incidence of retinal fluid subtypes among different subtypes of macular neovascularization (MNV) and evaluate the influence of the presence of retinal fluid subtypes on visual outcome in each subtype of MNV. Methods: This retrospective study included 248 patients (248 eyes) diagnosed with treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The incidence of retinal fluid subtypes at diagnosis and during the 24-month follow-up was compared among the different subtypes of MNV. In addition, visual acuity was compared between patients with and without the retinal fluid subtypes. Results: At diagnosis, there was a significant difference in the incidence of subretinal fluid (SRF), intraretinal fluid (IRF), and subretinal pigment epithelial fluid among type 1 MNV, type 2 MNV, type 3 MNV, and PCV (P < 0.001). The incidence of SRF (P < 0.001) during follow-up also differed among the 4 groups. In patients with type 1 MNV and IRF, the visual acuity at diagnosis (P = 0.004) and at 24 months (P < 0.001) were significantly worse. However, the presence of SRF was not associated with poor visual acuity. In type 3 MNV, there was no significant difference in visual acuity between patients with and without SRF/IRF. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the clinical significance of retinal fluid subtypes may differ in different subtypes of MNV, suggesting the need for analysis in isolation of each MNV subtype in fluid-based prognostication.

BACILLARY LAYER DETACHMENT IN A KOREAN COHORT WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of bacillary layer detachment (BALAD) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at Kim's Eye Hospital in South Korea. Patients who were diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration between January 2017 and December 2017 were included. The incidence of BALAD was compared among different types of macular neovascularization (MNV). The best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness at diagnosis were compared between patients showing BALAD at diagnosis and those who did not. RESULTS: Among the 442 patients included, BALAD was observed in 20 patients (4.5%). There was a significant difference in the incidence of BALAD between Type 1 MNV (2.7%), Type 2 MNV (12.5%), and Type 3 MNV (0%) (P < 0.001). The best-corrected visual acuity was significantly worse (mean 1.26 ± 0.79 vs. 0.62 ± 0.50, P = 0.001), and the central retinal thickness was significantly greater (mean 648.2 ± 211.1 µm vs. 464.0 ± 175.5 µm, P < 0.001) in patients with BALAD than in those without it. After antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy, all BALADs resolved. CONCLUSION: This study first reported the incidence of the BALAD in neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a Korean population. The incidence of BALAD was the highest in Type 2 MNVs. Bacillary layer detachment generally develops in eyes with great macular thickness and poor visual acuity.

Nonexudative morphologic changes of neovascularization on optical coherence tomography angiography as predictive factors for exudative recurrence in age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate morphologic changes of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) during the nonexudative period and to correlate the features and timing of recurrence in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. (AMD). METHODS: Two hundred thirty-eight eyes with type 1 CNV were retrospectively reviewed. For cases with exudative recurrence, OCTA images were tracked for analysis between the recurrences. Qualitative parameters of morphologic changes of CNV on OCTA, including tiny branching vessels, anastomotic loops, peripheral vascular arcade, and perilesional halo, were correlated with the features of exudative recurrence. RESULTS: Exudative recurrence was identified in 163 cases, and among them, nonexudative morphological changes in CNV were identified using OCTA in 45 cases. For the cases with nonexudative changes on OCTA, exudative recurrence eventually developed within 0.5-3.5 months (mean, 2.3 ± 2.0 months) after identifying morphologic changes OCTA. The following changes in CNV were revealed on OCTA: tiny branching vessels in 53.3% (24/45) of cases, anastomotic loops in 40.0% (18/45), peripheral vascular arcades in 44.4% (20/45), and perilesional halo in 35.6% (16/45). Among the morphologic parameters, development of tiny branching vessels was significantly associated with early exudative recurrence (1.5 ± 1.2 months, p = 0.019), higher incidence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) (p = 0.016), and subretinal or subretinal pigment epithelial hemorrhage (p = 0.023) at recurrence, compared with other morphologic changes. CONCLUSION: Development of tiny branching vessels of CNV on OCTA during the nonexudative period was associated with early exudative recurrence, including IRF or hemorrhage. Identifying the nonexudative changes of CNV on OCTA might predict exudative recurrence and provide additional parameters for monitoring neovascular AMD.

Development of Intraretinal Fluid in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration During Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment.

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors of intraretinal fluid (IRF) development during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A total of 425 treatment-naïve patients with neovascular AMD who completed 24 months of follow-up were enrolled. All patients were treated with an initial series of 3 monthly loading doses of anti-VEGF injections, followed by further injections as required. Baseline characteristics were evaluated using multivariate modeling to determine the potential risk factors for IRF development. RESULTS: IRF occurred in 40.2% (171/425 eyes) of all participants during the maintenance phase after the loading injections. The development of IRF during follow-up negatively affected visual outcomes regardless of the presence of IRF at baseline. Multivariate analysis showed that larger areas of choroidal neovascularization (odds ratio [OR] 1.360; P < .001), the presence of IRF at baseline (OR 5.469; P < .001), and the presence of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (OR 2.043; P = .022) were associated with an increased risk of IRF during follow-up. Type 1 (OR 2.005; P = .037) and type 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) (OR 2.643; P = .009) were also associated with a higher risk of IRF than aneurysmal type 1 MNV/polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The development of IRF during anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular AMD has additional negative effects on visual outcomes regardless of the presence of IRF at baseline. Baseline risk factors, including choroidal neovascularization size, presence of IRF at baseline, presence of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment, and MNV subtype may influence the development of IRF during anti-VEGF treatment.

Short-Term Outcomes of Switching to Ranibizumab in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Resistant to Aflibercept Therapy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of switching to ranibizumab in aflibercept-resistant polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). METHODS: This retrospective study included 18 eyes diagnosed with aflibercept-resistant PCV. All patients were treated with two to four consecutive ranibizumab injections at 4-5-week intervals. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) values before and after switching to ranibizumab were compared. The proportion of eyes showing ≥100 µm decrease in retinal thickness and/or complete resolution of fluid after switching was identified. RESULTS: The mean number of aflibercept injections before switching was 5.7 ± 3.3. After switching, a mean of 2.8 ± 0.6 consecutive ranibizumab injections was performed. The mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA was 0.41 ± 0.26 (Snellen equivalents = 20/51) before switching, and 0.40 ± 0.30 (20/50) after switching (p = 0.574). The mean CRT was 422.2 ± 152.4 µm before switching, and 400.7 ± 182.0 µm after switching (p = 0.236). A decrease in CRT of ≥100 µm, and/or complete resolution of fluid was noted in three eyes (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to ranibizumab in aflibercept-resistant polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy was not effective in most patients, suggesting the need for further investigation to seek more effective treatment options for this condition.

Five-Year Reactivation After Ranibizumab or Aflibercept Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.

Purpose: To evaluate 5-year reactivation after ranibizumab or aflibercept treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This retrospective study included 192 patients (192 eyes) who had been diagnosed with neovascular AMD or PCV and treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept. The incidence and timing of lesion reactivation during the 5-year follow-up period were evaluated, and the factors associated with reactivation were also investigated. Results: During the follow-up period, lesion reactivation was noted in 156 patients (81.3%) at a mean of 9.5 ± 10.5 months after the third antivascular endothelial growth factor injection. The incidence of reactivation was 59.9% during the first 12 months, 33.7% during ≥12 and <24 months, 11.8% during >24 and ≤36 months, 15.5% during >36 and ≤48 months, and 5.3% during >48 and ≤60 months. There was a significant difference in the incidence among the 5 periods (P < 0.001). The proportion of PCV was significantly higher in patients experiencing reactivation (51.9%) than in those who did not (30.6%) (P = 0.021). Conclusions: During the 5-year follow-up, lesion reactivation was noted in approximately four-fifths of the patients. The incidence of lesion reactivation was highest during the first 12 months and decreased thereafter. The incidence was higher in patients with PCV than in those with neovascular AMD, especially after 12 months.